Miro vs Mural: Which Whiteboard Fits Your Team Best?
Miro and Mural are the two most widely used collaborative online whiteboards. Both let distributed teams brainstorm, run workshops, plan projects, and map processes on an infinite canvas. The core experience is similar enough that most teams will find either tool works. The differences are in template depth, enterprise security features, AI integration, and the nuances of facilitator-focused features that matter for teams running structured workshops at scale.
Pricing and features verified against miro.com and mural.co (June 2026). Both tools use per-member pricing. Check official sites for current plans.
Quick Comparison
| Miro | Mural | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | 3 editable boards; unlimited viewers | 3 murals; up to 5 members |
| Paid plans | Starter ~$8/member/mo; Business ~$16/member/mo (annual) | Team+ ~$9.99/member/mo; Business ~$17.99/member/mo (annual) |
| Template library | 2,500+ templates across use cases | 300+ templates; strong facilitation focus |
| AI features | Miro AI (text-to-board, clustering, summarize) | Mural AI (sticky clustering, workshop assistant) |
| Facilitation tools | Timer, voting, reactions, follow-mode | Timer, voting, facilitation superpowers, anonymous voting |
| Integrations | Jira, Confluence, Slack, Figma, GitHub, 100+ | Jira, Microsoft Teams, Asana, Slack, Zoom |
| Enterprise security | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, SAML SSO | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, SAML SSO |
| Native diagramming | Advanced (flowcharts, ERDs, UML) | Basic shapes; Miro is stronger here |
Miro
What it is
Miro is the largest collaborative whiteboard platform, with over 60 million users. It covers everything from basic sticky-note brainstorming to complex product roadmaps, technical diagrams, and design workshops. The Starter plan is approximately $8/member/month (annual). Business is approximately $16/member/month. The free plan includes 3 editable boards with unlimited viewer access.
Strengths
Miro’s template library is the largest in the category — over 2,500 templates covering agile ceremonies, design thinking, OKR planning, customer journey mapping, user story mapping, and dozens of other use cases. Diagramming tools are genuinely strong: flowcharts, ERDs, UML diagrams, and org charts are built in and fit for technical teams. The Jira and Confluence integrations are deep, making Miro a natural extension for software teams already in the Atlassian ecosystem. Miro AI can generate an entire board from a text prompt, cluster sticky notes automatically, and summarize workshop outputs.
Limitations
Miro is broader than it is deep in any specific workflow. For teams that run professional facilitation workshops at scale, Mural’s facilitation-specific features (anonymous voting, facilitation superpowers, structured workshop modes) are more refined. The free plan’s 3-board limit applies to editable boards; archived boards still count against the limit.
Mural
What it is
Mural was founded in 2011 with a specific focus on design thinking and team collaboration facilitation. The Team+ plan is approximately $9.99/member/month (annual); Business is approximately $17.99/member/month. The free plan includes 3 murals and up to 5 members — suitable for small teams evaluating the tool.
Strengths
Mural’s facilitation features are its differentiator. The platform is designed for workshop facilitators who need to guide groups through structured collaborative exercises. Anonymous voting eliminates social pressure in group decisions. Facilitation superpowers let the host lock the canvas, direct participant attention, and control what’s visible during a session. The template library, while smaller than Miro’s, is more curated for structured workshop use cases. Microsoft Teams integration is deeper than Miro’s for organizations in the Microsoft 365 ecosystem.
Limitations
Mural’s template library is significantly smaller than Miro’s. Diagramming capabilities are basic compared to Miro — for technical diagrams like flowcharts or ERDs, Miro is clearly the better choice. AI features are similar in concept but less mature in execution than Miro’s. For teams that just need a whiteboard without structured facilitation, Mural’s feature set does not justify price parity with Miro.
How They Compare
Template depth
Miro wins on volume (2,500+ vs 300+). But Mural’s templates are purpose-built for facilitation workflows — if you run structured workshops, Mural’s templates are more immediately usable without customization.
Technical diagramming
Miro wins clearly. For software teams that need flowcharts, UML, ERDs, or technical architecture diagrams on the same canvas as their sprint planning, Miro’s diagramming is meaningfully better.
Facilitation for structured workshops
Mural wins for professional facilitators. Anonymous voting, facilitation superpowers, and the structured workshop model are features built specifically for people who run collaborative sessions as a job, not just occasional meetings.
Who Should Choose Miro
Product and engineering teams that need both visual collaboration and technical diagramming on the same canvas. Teams deeply embedded in the Atlassian ecosystem (Jira, Confluence). Organizations that need a large, general-purpose template library across multiple use cases. Teams that want the broadest AI canvas generation features.
Who Should Choose Mural
Professional facilitators and design thinking practitioners who run structured workshops as a core part of their work. Organizations in the Microsoft 365 / Teams ecosystem where the deeper Teams integration is valuable. Teams where anonymous voting and facilitation control features are required for high-stakes group decision-making sessions.
How to Decide
For most teams, Miro is the default choice — it is larger, has more templates, and integrates more broadly. If you run structured facilitation workshops regularly and facilitation-specific features are core to your use case, Mural deserves a serious evaluation. Both have free plans; the 3-board limit on both is enough to run a real workshop before committing.
For more on visual collaboration tools, see our comparison of Miro vs FigJam, our picks for the best project management tools for small teams, and our guide to choosing project management software without overbuying.